Construction information changes: product documents are revised, source editions change and errors can be discovered. Equiptova treats correction as part of publication rather than as an exception to it.
What matters
- Material calculation errors should be corrected with regression tests so the same defect is less likely to return.
- Source or edition changes should update both the claim and its evidence record.
- Professional or local-code corrections should not be generalized beyond the jurisdiction or scope that supports them.
- Pages can be returned to a nonpublic state when a material evidence gap is discovered.
How to use this page
This policy describes the controls used for the current public site. It is written to match implemented behavior: the launch excludes unresolved specialist-review process pages, keeps source and review states separate, and does not claim professional review where no verified reviewer exists.
Fix the affected information, not just the visible sentence
A correction process should identify what is wrong, what pages or tools depend on it, and whether the issue changes calculations, references, internal links or user-facing conclusions.
Scope the issue
Determine whether the problem is isolated or shared by multiple pages or methods.
Correct the source of truth
Where possible, fix the underlying method or controlled value rather than patching only one rendered occurrence.
Recheck dependent outputs
After a meaningful correction, verify the pages and tools that relied on the changed information.